Health & Medical Heart Diseases

Have the Risks of Rosiglitazone Been Exaggerated?

Have the Risks of Rosiglitazone Been Exaggerated?
Nissen and Wolski recently reported a meta-analysis of 42 clinical trials of 27,847 subjects that ignited a firestorm of controversy by claiming that treatment with rosiglitazone (Avandia, GlaxoSmithKline [GSK]), a widely prescribed PPARγ agonist, was associated with a "... worrisome... " 43% greater risk of myocardial infarction (MI; p = 0.03) and a 64% greater risk of cardiovascular death (CVD; p = 0.06). A number of criticisms have been raised against this analysis with many pointing to the initial conclusions as premature, indefinite or even alarmist. We herein attempt to further explicate these issues, and offer suggestions for potential solutions.

Related posts "Health & Medical : Heart Diseases"

Cardiovascular Health Among The Australian Indigenous People - 5 Major Risk Factors

Heart Diseases

Use of Device Therapies for Heart Failure

Heart Diseases

Discover How To Raise HDL Cholesterol Levels

Heart Diseases

Peripheral Arterial Disease Leg Exercises

Heart Diseases

Don't Die Early - Look After Your Heart

Heart Diseases

Drug-Eluting Stents: A Comprehensive Appraisal

Heart Diseases

What is Arteriosclerosis & Possible Treatments?

Heart Diseases

Change in Heartbeat-Preparing For Your Appointment

Heart Diseases

Warm Sauna May Help Treat Heart Failure

Heart Diseases

Leave a Comment